asp.net 组合模式的一个例子
(编辑:jimmy 日期: 2025/7/1 浏览:2)
复制代码 代码如下:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace Test
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var customer = new Customer
{
IsActive = true,
LateFees = 100M,
TotalRentNumber = 10
};
Console.WriteLine(customer.CanRent());
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
public interface ISpecification<T>
{
/// <summary>
/// 是否可以租赁
/// </summary>
bool IsSatisfiedBy(T entity);
/// <summary>
/// 与操作
/// </summary>
ISpecification<T> And(ISpecification<T> other);
/// <summary>
/// 否操作
/// </summary>
ISpecification<T> Not();
}
/// <summary>
/// 基类
/// </summary>
public abstract class CompositeSpecification<T> : ISpecification<T>
{
public abstract bool IsSatisfiedBy(T candidate);
public ISpecification<T> And(ISpecification<T> other)
{
return new AndSpecification<T>(this, other);
}
public ISpecification<T> Not()
{
return new NotSpecification<T>(this);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// 与操作
/// </summary>
public class AndSpecification<T> : CompositeSpecification<T>
{
private ISpecification<T> leftSpecification;
private ISpecification<T> rightSpecification;
public AndSpecification(ISpecification<T> leftSpecification, ISpecification<T> rightSpecification)
{
this.leftSpecification = leftSpecification;
this.rightSpecification = rightSpecification;
}
public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(T entity)
{
return leftSpecification.IsSatisfiedBy(entity) && rightSpecification.IsSatisfiedBy(entity);
}
}
///<summary>
///否操作
/// </summary>
public class NotSpecification<T> : CompositeSpecification<T>
{
private ISpecification<T> innerSpecification;
public NotSpecification(ISpecification<T> innerSpecification)
{
this.innerSpecification = innerSpecification;
}
public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(T entity)
{
return !innerSpecification.IsSatisfiedBy(entity);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// 是否达到最大的规定租赁数
/// </summary>
public class HasReachedMaxSpecification : CompositeSpecification<Customer>
{
public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(Customer entity)
{
return entity.TotalRentNumber > 5;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// 是否激活
/// </summary>
public class CustomerActiveSpecification : CompositeSpecification<Customer>
{
public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(Customer entity)
{
return entity.IsActive;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// 是否欠费
/// </summary>
public class CustomerHasLateFeesSpecification : CompositeSpecification<Customer>
{
public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(Customer entity)
{
return entity.LateFees > 0;
}
}
public class Customer
{
private ISpecification<Customer> hasReachedRentalThreshold;
private ISpecification<Customer> customerIsActive;
private ISpecification<Customer> customerHasLateFees;
public Customer()
{
hasReachedRentalThreshold = new HasReachedMaxSpecification();
customerIsActive = new CustomerActiveSpecification();
customerHasLateFees = new CustomerHasLateFeesSpecification();
}
/// <summary>
/// 用户租赁DVD数量
/// </summary>
public int TotalRentNumber
{
get;
set;
}
/// <summary>
/// 账户是否激活
/// </summary>
public bool IsActive
{
get;
set;
}
/// <summary>
/// 用户之前是否还欠费
/// </summary>
public decimal LateFees
{
get;
set;
}
public bool CanRent()
{
ISpecification<Customer> canRent = customerIsActive.And(hasReachedRentalThreshold.Not()).And(customerHasLateFees.Not());
return canRent.IsSatisfiedBy(this);
}
}
}
荣耀猎人回归!七大亮点看懂不只是轻薄本,更是游戏本的MagicBook Pro 16.
人们对于笔记本电脑有一个固有印象:要么轻薄但性能一般,要么性能强劲但笨重臃肿。然而,今年荣耀新推出的MagicBook Pro 16刷新了人们的认知——发布会上,荣耀宣布猎人游戏本正式回归,称其继承了荣耀 HUNTER 基因,并自信地为其打出“轻薄本,更是游戏本”的口号。
众所周知,寻求轻薄本的用户普遍更看重便携性、外观造型、静谧性和打字办公等用机体验,而寻求游戏本的用户则普遍更看重硬件配置、性能释放等硬核指标。把两个看似难以相干的产品融合到一起,我们不禁对它产生了强烈的好奇:作为代表荣耀猎人游戏本的跨界新物种,它究竟做了哪些平衡以兼顾不同人群的各类需求呢?