getElementsByTagName vs selectNodes效率 及兼容的selectNodes实现

(编辑:jimmy 日期: 2025/10/28 浏览:2)

于是就测试了下:
复制代码 代码如下:
var stringToDom=function(text) {
var doc;
if(window.ActiveXObject) {
doc = new ActiveXObject("MSXML2.DOMDocument");
doc.loadXML(text).documentElement;
} else {
doc = (new DOMParser()).parseFromString(text,"text/xml");
}
return doc;
}
var xmlDoc=stringToDom("<body><a href='a'>a</a><a href='b'>b</a></body>"),
c,
d1=new Date();
for(var i=0;i<100000;i++){
c=xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("a");
}
document.write("getElementsByTagName: ",new Date()-d1);
d1=new Date();
try{
for(var i=0;i<100000;i++){
c=xmlDoc.selectNodes("a");
}
document.write("<br/>selectNodes: ",new Date()-d1);
}catch(ex){document.write("<br/>error:"+ex)}

在IE下selectNodes还是快多了,
可以FF下却没有这个方法,google了下,找了方法,使用XPathEvaluator来实现,下面是具体实现,不过效率就不太理想了:
复制代码 代码如下:
if (!window.ActiveXObject) {
(function(){
var oEvaluator=new XPathEvaluator(),oResult;
XMLDocument.prototype.selectNodes = function(sXPath) {
oResult = oEvaluator.evaluate(sXPath, this, null, XPathResult.ORDERED_NODE_ITERATOR_TYPE, null);
var aNodes = [];
if (oResult != null) {
var oElement = oResult.iterateNext();
while (oElement) {
aNodes[aNodes.length]=oElement;
oElement = oResult.iterateNext();
}
}
return aNodes;
}
})()
}

evaluate(xpathExpression, contextNode, namespaceResolver, resultType, result);
Returns an XPathResult based on an XPath expression and other given parameters.
xpathExpression is a string representing the XPath to be evaluated.
contextNode specifies the context node for the query (see the [http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath XPath specification). It's common to pass document as the context node.
namespaceResolver is a function that will be passed any namespace prefixes and should return a string representing the namespace URI associated with that prefix. It will be used to resolve prefixes within the XPath itself, so that they can be matched with the document. null is common for HTML documents or when no namespace prefixes are used.
resultType is an integer that corresponds to the type of result XPathResult to return. Use named constant properties, such as XPathResult.ANY_TYPE, of the XPathResult constructor, which correspond to integers from 0 to 9.
result is an existing XPathResult to use for the results. null is the most common and will create a new XPathResult
完整的测试页面:
复制代码 代码如下:
<!doctype HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>selectNodes&getElementsByTagName</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="author" content="sohighthesky"/>
<meta name="Keywords" content="selectNodes vs getElementsByTagName"/>
</head>
<body>
</body>
<script type="text/javascript">
/*
*author:sohighthesky -- http://www.cnblogs.com/sohighthesky
*content: selectNodes vs getElementsByTagName
*/
if (!window.ActiveXObject) {
(function(){
var oEvaluator=new XPathEvaluator(),oResult;
XMLDocument.prototype.selectNodes = function(sXPath) {
oResult = oEvaluator.evaluate(sXPath, this, null, XPathResult.ORDERED_NODE_ITERATOR_TYPE, null);
var aNodes = [];
if (oResult != null) {
var oElement = oResult.iterateNext();
while (oElement) {
aNodes[aNodes.length]=oElement;
oElement = oResult.iterateNext();
}
}
return aNodes;
}
XMLDocument.prototype.selectSingleNode = function(sXPath) {
oResult = oEvaluator.evaluate(sXPath, this, null, XPathResult.FIRST_ORDERED_NODE_TYPE, null);
// FIRST_ORDERED_NODE_TYPE returns the first match to the xpath.
return oResult==null?null:oResult.singleNodeValue;
}
})()
}
var stringToDom=function(text) {
var doc;
if(window.ActiveXObject) {
doc = new ActiveXObject("MSXML2.DOMDocument");
doc.loadXML(text).documentElement;
} else {
doc = (new DOMParser()).parseFromString(text,"text/xml");
}
return doc;
}
var xmlDoc=stringToDom("<body><a href='a'>a</a><a href='b'>b</a></body>"),
c,
d1=new Date();
for(var i=0;i<100000;i++){
c=xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("a");
}
document.write("getElementsByTagName: ",new Date()-d1);
d1=new Date();
try{
for(var i=0;i<100000;i++){
c=xmlDoc.selectNodes("a");
}
document.write("<br/>selectNodes: ",new Date()-d1);
}catch(ex){document.write("<br/>error:"+ex)}
/*
var n=xmlDoc.selectSingleNode("body/a"),doc=xmlDoc.selectSingleNode("body");//alert(n.childNodes[0].nodeValue)
for(var i=0;i<10000;i++){
doc.appendChild(n.cloneNode(true))
}
d1=new Date();
c=xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("a");
document.write("<br/>getElementsByTagName: ",new Date()-d1);
d1=new Date();
c=xmlDoc.selectNodes("a");
document.write("<br/>selectNodes: ",new Date()-d1);
*/
</script>
</html>
一句话新闻
一文看懂荣耀MagicBook Pro 16
荣耀猎人回归!七大亮点看懂不只是轻薄本,更是游戏本的MagicBook Pro 16.
人们对于笔记本电脑有一个固有印象:要么轻薄但性能一般,要么性能强劲但笨重臃肿。然而,今年荣耀新推出的MagicBook Pro 16刷新了人们的认知——发布会上,荣耀宣布猎人游戏本正式回归,称其继承了荣耀 HUNTER 基因,并自信地为其打出“轻薄本,更是游戏本”的口号。
众所周知,寻求轻薄本的用户普遍更看重便携性、外观造型、静谧性和打字办公等用机体验,而寻求游戏本的用户则普遍更看重硬件配置、性能释放等硬核指标。把两个看似难以相干的产品融合到一起,我们不禁对它产生了强烈的好奇:作为代表荣耀猎人游戏本的跨界新物种,它究竟做了哪些平衡以兼顾不同人群的各类需求呢?